David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio 18 (1):104–106 (2005)
In ‘Anthropocentrism and the Problem of Evil’ Timothy Chappell argues that one cannot advance the following two criticisms of Christianity at the same time: (1) Christianity is an implausibly anthropocentric religion, and (2) Christianity has no convincing answer to the problem of natural evil. I demonstrate that Chappell’s argument is unsuccessful by providing three possible, and consistent, interpretations of (1) and (2).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Luke Gelinas (2009). The Problem of Natural Evil I: General Theistic Replies. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):533-559.
Similar books and articles
Brian Davies (2011). Thomas Aquinas on God and Evil. Oxford University Press.
Timothy Chappell (2001). Anthropocentrism and the Problem of Natural Evil: A Note. Ratio 14 (1):84–85.
Margaret Daphne Hampson (1996). After Christianity. Trinity Press International.
Hans Küng (1984/1991). Eternal Life?: Life After Death as a Medical, Philosophical, and Theological Problem. Crossroad.
Richard Cording (1972). Some Criticisms of Chappell's Argument for Solipsism. Journal of Critical Analysis 4 (1):21-24.
Daniel J. Lasker (2007). Jewish Philosophical Polemics Against Christianity in the Middle Ages. Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.
T. D. J. Chappell (2004/2005). Reading Plato's Theaetetus. Hackett Pub. Co..
Yujin Nagasawa (2005). Chappell on the Consistency of Criticisms of Christianity. Ratio 18 (1):104-106.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #267,897 of 1,102,060 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?