David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio 18 (1):104–106 (2005)
In ‘Anthropocentrism and the Problem of Evil’ Timothy Chappell argues that one cannot advance the following two criticisms of Christianity at the same time: (1) Christianity is an implausibly anthropocentric religion, and (2) Christianity has no convincing answer to the problem of natural evil. I demonstrate that Chappell’s argument is unsuccessful by providing three possible, and consistent, interpretations of (1) and (2).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Luke Gelinas (2009). The Problem of Natural Evil I: General Theistic Replies. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):533-559.
Similar books and articles
Brian Davies (2011). Thomas Aquinas on God and Evil. Oxford University Press.
T. D. J. Chappell (2004/2005). Reading Plato's Theaetetus. Hackett Pub. Co..
Daniel J. Lasker (2007). Jewish Philosophical Polemics Against Christianity in the Middle Ages. Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.
Richard Cording (1972). Some Criticisms of Chappell's Argument for Solipsism. Journal of Critical Analysis 4 (1):21-24.
Hans Küng (1984/1991). Eternal Life?: Life After Death as a Medical, Philosophical, and Theological Problem. Crossroad.
Margaret Daphne Hampson (1996). After Christianity. Trinity Press International.
Timothy Chappell (2001). Anthropocentrism and the Problem of Natural Evil: A Note. Ratio 14 (1):84–85.
Yujin Nagasawa (2005). Chappell on the Consistency of Criticisms of Christianity. Ratio 18 (1):104-106.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #383,052 of 1,699,575 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?