Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||The approach can be characterized at two somewhat independent levels. The first is the overall framework for the theory of meaning, and how this framework is integrated into linguistics, philosophy of language, and cognitive science (section 1). The second is the formal machinery that has been developed to achieve the goals of this framework (sections 2 and 3). The general framework might be realized in terms of other formal approaches, and many aspects of the formal machinery can empirically motivated within any framework for studying meaning.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Ralph Wedgwood (2001). Conceptual Role Semantics for Moral Terms. Philosophical Review 110 (1):1-30.
Katalin Balog (2001). Commentary on Frank Jackson's From Metaphysics to Ethics. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):645–652.
Harold I. Brown (1986). Sellars, Concepts, and Conceptual Change. Synthese 68 (August):275-307.
Eli Dresner (2002). Measurement Theoretic Semantics and the Semantics of Necessity. Synthese 130 (3):413 - 440.
Harry C. Bunt (1985). Mass Terms and Model-Theoretic Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
Ingo Brigandt (2004). Conceptual Role Semantics, the Theory Theory, and Conceptual Change. In Proceedings First Joint Conference of the Society for Philosophy and Psychology and the European Society for Philosophy and Psychology, Barcelona, Spain.
Chris Fox (2005). Foundations of Intensional Semantics. Blackwell Pub..
Laura Schroeter, Two-Dimensional Semantics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads166 ( #2,697 of 740,793 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,533 of 740,793 )
How can I increase my downloads?