|Abstract||Cancer treatment decisions should be based on all available evidence. But this evidence is complex and varied: it includes not only the patient’s symptoms and expert knowledge of the relevant causal processes, but also clinical databases relating to past patients, databases of observations made at the molecular level, and evidence encapsulated in scientiﬁc papers and medical informatics systems. Objective Bayesian nets oﬀer a principled path to knowledge integration, and we show in this chapter how they can be applied to integrate various kinds of evidence in the cancer domain. This is important from the systems biology perspective, which needs to integrate data that concern diﬀerent levels of analysis, and is also important from the point of view of medical informatics.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Matt Williams & Jon Williamson (2006). Combining Argumentation and Bayesian Nets for Breast Cancer Prognosis. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (1-2).
Roy Gilbar & Ora Gilbar (2009). The Medical Decision-Making Process and the Family: The Case of Breast Cancer Patients and Their Husbands. Bioethics 23 (3):183-192.
Megan Eide & Ann Milliken Pederson (2009). God, Disease, and Spiritual Dilemmas: Reading the Lives of Women with Breast Cancer. Zygon 44 (1):85-96.
Jurrit Bergsma (1994). Illness, the Mind, and the Body: Cancer and Immunology: An Introduction. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (4).
Darrell P. Rowbottom (2008). On the Proximity of the Logical and 'Objective Bayesian' Interpretations of Probability. Erkenntnis 69 (3):335-349.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads3 ( #201,837 of 549,068 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,068 )
How can I increase my downloads?