Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (2):187-205 (2008)
|Abstract||i The 2005 decision by Judge John E. Jones in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District was celebrated by all red-blooded American liberals as a victory over the forces of darkness. The result was probably inevitable, in view of the reckless expression by some members of the Dover School Board of their desire to put religion into the classroom, and the clumsiness of their prescribed statement in trying to dissimulate that aim.1 But the conﬂicts aired in this trial—over the status of evolutionary theory, the arguments for intelligent design, and the nature of science—reveal an intellectually unhealthy situation. The political urge to defend science education against the threats of religious orthodoxy, understandable though it is, has resulted in a counterorthodoxy, supported by bad arguments, and a tendency to overstate the legitimate scientiﬁc claims of evolutionary theory. Skeptics about the theory are seen as so dangerous, and so disreputably motivated, that they must be denied any shred of..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Angus Campbell & Stephen C. Meyer (eds.) (2003). Darwinism, Design, and Public Education. Michigan State University Press.
Scott F. Aikin, Michael Harbour & Robert B. Talisse (2010). Nagel on Public Education and Intelligent Design. Journal of Philosophical Research 35:209-219.
Scott Aikin, Michael Harbour & Robert Talisse (2010). Evolution, Intelligent Design and Public Education: A Comment on Thomas Nagel. Spontaneous Generations 3 (1).
Sahotra Sarkar (2011). The Science Question in Intelligent Design. Synthese 178 (2):291 - 305.
Added to index2009-02-08
Total downloads158 ( #2,992 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,863 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?