David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 10 (3):213 – 244 (2000)
This paper attempts to make intelligible the logic contained in the Diamond Sutra. This 'logic' is called the 'logic of not'. It is stated in a propositional form: 'A is not A, therefore it is A'. Since this formulation is contradictory or paradoxical when it is read in light of Aristotelean logic, one might dismiss it as nonsensical. In order to show that it is neither nonsensical nor meaningless, the paper will articulate the philosophical reasons why the Sutra makes its position in this contradictory form. The thesis to be presented is that as long as one understands the 'logic of not' from a dualistic, either-or egological standpoint, it remains contradictory, but in order to properly understand it, one must effect a perspectival shift from the dualistic, egological stance to a non-dualistic, non-egological stance. This thesis is advanced with a broader concern in mind: to reexamine how the self understands itself, how it understands others, and how it understands its intra-ecological relationship with nature.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Heinrich Wansing (2002). Diamonds Are a Philosopher's Best Friends. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (6):591-612.
N. S. Hellerstein (2009). Diamond: A Paradox Logic. World Scientific.
Ralph H. Johnson (1999). The Relation Between Formal and Informal Logic. Argumentation 13 (3):265-274.
Guram Bezhanishvili, Leo Esakia & David Gabelaia (2010). The Modal Logic of Stone Spaces: Diamond as Derivative. Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (1):26-40.
Lucinda Joy Peach (2002). Social Responsibility, Sex Change, and Salvation: Gender Justice in the "Lotus Sūtra". Philosophy East and West 52 (1):50-74.
Wen Haiming (2011). Two Versions of Desire-Based Subjectivism: A Comparative Study of the Analects and the Lotus Sutra. Asian Philosophy 21 (4):419 - 435.
Matti Eklund & Daniel Kolak (2002). Is Hintikka's Logic First-Order? Synthese 131 (3):371 - 388.
G. Aldo Antonelli & Richmond H. Thomason (2002). Representability in Second-Order Propositional Poly-Modal Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (3):1039-1054.
Frank J. Hoffman (2001). Non-Dual Awareness and Logic. Asian Philosophy 11 (2):125 – 132.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #65,667 of 1,699,833 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #105,649 of 1,699,833 )
How can I increase my downloads?