David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Neuroethics 3 (2):109-119 (2010)
There is a remedy available for many of our ailments: Psychopharmacology promises to alleviate unsatisfying memory, bad moods, and low self-esteem. Bioethicists have long discussed the ethical implications of enhancement interventions. However, they have not considered relevant evidence from psychology and economics. The growth in autonomy in many areas of life is publicized as progress for the individual. However, the broadening of areas at one’s disposal together with the increasing individualization of value systems leads to situations in which the range of options asks too much of the individual. I scrutinize whether increased self-determination and unbound possibilities are really in a person’s best interests. Evidence from psychology and economics challenges the assumption that unlimited autonomy is best in all cases. The responsibility for autonomous self-formation that comes with possibilities provided by neuro-enhancement developments can be a burden. To guarantee quality of life I suggest a balance of beneficence, support, and respect for autonomy.
|Keywords||Neuroenhancement Psychopharmacology Choice Autonomy Well-being|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
Daniel Callahan (1984). Autonomy: A Moral Good, Not a Moral Obsession. Hastings Center Report 14 (5):40-42.
Gerald Dworkin (1988). The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.
Jon Elster (2000). Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. Cambridge University Press.
Martha J. Farah (2005). Neuroethics: The Practical and the Philosophical. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (1):34-40.
R. Gillon (2003). Ethics Needs Principles—Four Can Encompass the Rest—and Respect for Autonomy Should Be “First Among Equals”. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (5):307-312.
Citations of this work BETA
Saskia K. Nagel & Peter B. Reiner (2013). Autonomy Support to Foster Individuals' Flourishing. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (6):36 - 37.
Similar books and articles
John Harris (2011). Moral Enhancement and Freedom. Bioethics 25 (2):102-111.
Maartje Schermer (2013). Health, Happiness and Human Enhancement—Dealing with Unexpected Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuroethics 6 (3):435-445.
Jonathan Wolff (2002). Addressing Disadvantage and the Human Good. Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (3):207–218.
Benjamin Hale (2005). Identity Crisis: Face Recognition Technology and Freedom of the Will. Ethics, Place and Environment 8 (2):141 – 158.
Thomas Douglas (2008). Moral Enhancement. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):228-245.
Allen Buchanan (2009). Human Nature and Enhancement. Bioethics 23 (3):141-150.
Jonathan Wolff (2009). Cognitive Disability in a Society of Equals. Metaphilosophy 40 (3-4):402-415.
Michael Fuchs (2012). Reshaping Human Intelligence: The Debate About Genetic Enhancement of Cognitive Functions. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (2):165-181.
Rebecca Roache (2007). Should We Enhance Self-Esteem? Philosophica 79:71-91.
Nick Bostrom (2009). Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
Added to index2010-05-07
Total downloads51 ( #26,544 of 1,089,063 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #24,247 of 1,089,063 )
How can I increase my downloads?