Thomas versus Thomas: A new approach to Nagel's bat argument

Inquiry 46 (3):377-395 (2003)
Abstract
i l l ustrat es t he di ffi cul t y of providing a purely physical characterisation of phenomenal experi ence wi t ha vi vi d exampl e about a bat ’ s sensory apparatus. Whi l e a number of obj ect i ons have al ready been made to Nagel.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201740310002415
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 19,608
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Nagel (1974). What is It Like to Be a Bat? Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
Saul Kripke (2010). Naming and Necessity. In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge 431-433.

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Shaffarullah Abdul Rahman (2008). Rethinking Nagel. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 42:189-197.
Christoph Hoerl (2015). XI—Writing on the Page of Consciousness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 115 (3pt3):187-209.
Torin Alter (2002). Nagel on Imagination and Physicalism. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:143-58.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

258 ( #8,039 of 1,789,736 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

17 ( #47,102 of 1,789,736 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.