Why theories of word learning don't always work as theories of verb learning

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1113-1114 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bloom's theory of word learning has difficulty accounting for children's verb acquisition. There is no predominant preverbal event concept, akin to the preverbal object concept, to direct children's early event-verb mappings. Children may take advantage of grammatical and linguistic information in verb acquisition earlier than Bloom allows. A distinction between lexical and grammatical learning is difficult to maintain for verb acquisition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Word extension: A key to early word learning and domain-specificity.Sandra R. Waxman - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1121-1122.
Evolutionary consequences of language learning.Partha Niyogi & Robert C. Berwick - 1997 - Linguistics and Philosophy 20 (6):697-719.
Précis of how children learn the meanings of words.Paul Bloom - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1095-1103.
Controversies in the study of word learning.Paul Bloom - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1124-1130.
Don't preverbal infants map words onto referents?Lakshmi J. Gogate - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1106-1107.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
32 (#487,332)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references