David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philo 3 (1):63-72 (2000)
In a recent essay, Quentin Smith revisits a question of philosophical cosmology. Why does the universe exist? This is one way of asking the existence question EQ. Smith notes that all theistic philosophical cosmologists have answered this question in terms of God’s creative choice. Smith favors an “atheistic” philosophical answer: “The universe exists because it has an unconditional probability of existing based on a fundamental law of nature.” He further declares: “This law of nature ... is inconsistent with theism and implies that God does not exist.” The structure of Smith's reasoning in defense of these claims is the following: (1) The answer to EQ of theistic philosophical cosmologists is logically inconsistent with the answer of atheistic philosophical cosmologists. (2) Therefore, theistic and atheistic philosophical cosmologies are logically inconsistent with each other. (3) The atheistic answer to EQ is a complete answer to EQ. (4) Therefore, theism is demonstrably false. I shall argue that Smith’s reasoning in defense of (1) is not sound. From that, it follows that (2) is not a proven truth. Assumption (3) is controversial, and in the present context question-begging. It presupposes that materialism is true. Therefore, (4) is not a proven truth
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Quentin Smith (1998). Why Stephen Hawking's Cosmology Precludes a Creator. Philo 1 (1):75-93.
Quentin Smith (2000). Concerning the Metaphysical Necessity of the Universe Beginning Uncaused. Philo 3 (1):73-75.
Ned Markosian (1995). On the Argument From Quantum Cosmology Against Theism. Analysis 55 (4):247 - 251.
Hans Halvorson (forthcoming). Theism and Physical Cosmology. In Charles Taliaferro, Victoria Harrison & Stewart Goetz (eds.), Routledge Companion to Theism.
Rob Lovering (2010). The Problem of the Theistic Evidentialist Philosophers. Philo 13 (2):185-200.
Graham Oppy (1997). On Some Alleged Consequences of 'the Hartle-Hawking Cosmology'. Sophia 36 (1):84-95.
Graham Oppy (1997). On Some Alleged Consequences of 'The Hartle-Hawking Cosmology'. Sophia 36 (1):84-95.
Stephen Grover (1998). Cosmological Fecundity. Inquiry 41 (3):277 – 299.
Rob Lovering (2013). God and Evidence: Problems for Theistic Philosophers. Bloomsbury Academic.
David M. Holley (2011). How Can a Believer Doubt That God Exists? Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245):746-761.
Daniel Murphy (2008). Quantum Cosmology and Theism. Philo 11 (1):93-119.
William Lane Craig (1993). Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology. Oxford University Press.
Jan Such (2007). The Peculiar Status of Cosmology As a Science. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:73-80.
Paul Kabay (2008). Explanatory Atheism. Philo 11 (1):78-92.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads172 ( #11,634 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #45,081 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?