Graduate studies at Western
Analysis 70 (2):263-270 (2010)
|Abstract||I argue that perceptual content is always affected by the allocation of one’s attention. Perception attributes determinable and determinate properties to the perceived scene. Attention makes (or tries to make) our perceptual attribution of properties more determinate. Hence, a change in our attention changes the determinacy of the properties attributed to the perceived scene.|
|Keywords||Attention Intentionalism Phenomenology Inattentional blindness Perceptual content|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Similar books and articles
Susanna Schellenberg (2011). Perceptual Content Defended. Noûs 45 (4):714 - 750.
Josefa Toribio (2008). State Versus Content: The Unfair Trial of Perceptual Nonconceptualism. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 69 (3):351 - 361.
Martin Davies (1992). Perceptual Content and Local Supervenience. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 66:21-45.
T. M. Crowther (2006). Two Conceptions of Conceptualism and Nonconceptualism. Erkenntnis 65 (2):245-276.
Wayne Wu (2011). What is Conscious Attention? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (1):93-120.
John Dilworth (2005). The Double Content of Perception. Synthese 146 (3):225-243.
Sean D. Kelly (2001). The Non-Conceptual Content of Perceptual Experience: Situation Dependence and Fineness of Grain. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):601-608.
John Dilworth (2005). The Twofold Orientational Structure of Perception. Philosophical Psychology 18 (2):187-203.
Bence Nanay (2011). Ambiguous Figures, Attention, and Perceptual Content: Reply to Jagnow. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4):557-561.
Added to index2010-03-27
Total downloads102 ( #7,550 of 739,350 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,186 of 739,350 )
How can I increase my downloads?