David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In C. Abell & K. Bantilaki (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Depiction. Oxford University Press (2010)
It has been argued that picture perception is sometimes, but not always, ‘inflected’. Sometimes the picture’s design ‘inflects’, or is ‘recruited’ into the depicted scene. The aim of this paper is to cash out what is meant by these metaphors. Our perceptual state is different when we see an object fact to face or when we see it in a picture. But there is also a further distinction: our perceptual state is very different if we perceive objects in pictures in an inflected or uninflected manner. The question is what this difference amounts to. My answer is that it is a difference of attention. In the case of inflected, but not uninflected, picture perception, we are consciously attending to certain properties: to relational property that cannot be fully characterized without reference to both the picture’s design and to the depicted object. I defend this way of interpreting inflected picture perception from some important objections and emphasize the importance of this, inflected, way of perceiving pictures.
|Keywords||Twofoldness Picture perception Depiction Inflection|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Patricia Pisters (2012). The Neuro-Image: A Deleuzian Film-Philosophy of Digital Screen Culture. Stanford University Press.
Dominic Lopes (1996). Understanding Pictures. Oxford University Press.
Bence Nanay (2009). Narrative Pictures. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67 (1):119 - 129.
Robert Hopkins (1997). Pictures and Beauty. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97 (2):177–194.
Boyd Millar (2006). The Conflicted Character of Picture Perception. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (4):471–477.
Robert Hopkins (2010). Inflected Pictorial Experience: Its Treatment and Significance. In Catharine Abell & Katerina Bantinaki (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Picturing. Oxford University Press.
John Zeimbekis (2010). Pictures and Singular Thought. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (1):11-21.
Bence Nanay (2011). Perceiving Pictures. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4):461-480.
Bence Nanay (2005). Is Twofoldness Necessary for Representational Seeing? British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):248-257.
Added to index2010-07-13
Total downloads56 ( #22,746 of 1,004,592 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,617 of 1,004,592 )
How can I increase my downloads?