Chôra 5:45-55 (2007)
|Abstract||Iamblichus has long lived under the shadow of Plotinus. One can easily recognize this from the historiography of the Neoplatonic school starting, for example, with J.J. Brucker's Historia critica philosophiae (1742) and continuing with Hegel and 19th century historians like Simon and Vacherot in France, Kroll and Zeller in Germany. But from Praechter on Iamblichus was acknowledged more and more as an original thinker and the real systematizer of the late Neoplatonic School. We can see more clearly now that the inclusion of theurgy into Neoplatonism does not mean a simple abandonment of philosophy or rational discourse, and that the discipline of textual exegesis does not negate the originality of the commentator. In Proclus, for one, these complementary strains are strongly present. In rebuilding the whole Platonic system, Iamblichus - the Chrysippus of Neoplatonism - skillfully incorporated elements like the Chaldean triads which were unknown to Plotinus, and presented a completely new account of the nature of theology. This feat shows a genius no less impressive, albeit of another type, than the one disclosed by Plotinus himself|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sara Ahbel-Rappe (1999). Reading Neoplatonism: Non-Discursive Thinking in the Texts of Plotinus, Proclus, and Damascius. Cambridge University Press.
Dennis C. Clark (2008). Iamblichus' Egyptian Neoplatonic Theology in de Mysteriis. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2 (2):164-205.
Edward Moore, Neoplatonism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
M. J. Edwards (ed.) (2000). Neoplatonic Saints: The Lives of Plotinus and Proclus by Their Students. Liverpool University Press.
E. V. Afonasin, John M. Dillon & John F. Finamore (eds.) (2012). Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism. Brill.
Iamblichus (1988). Iamblichus, the Exhortation to Philosophy: Including the Letters of Iamblichus and Proclus' Commentary on the Chaldean Oracles. Phanes Press.
Proclus (1992). The Elements of Theology =. Oxford University Press.
John Dillon (2007). Iamblichus' Defence of Theurgy: Some Reflections. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 1 (1):30-41.
M. J. Edwards (2012). Plotinus (J.-M.) Narbonne Plotinus in Dialogue with the Gnostics. (Studies in Platonism, Neoplatonism, and the Platonic Tradition 11.) Pp. Xii + 152. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2011. Cased, €86, US$118. ISBN: 978-90-04-20326-6. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 62 (02):463-465.
Svetla Slaveva-Griffin (2009). Plotinus on Number. Oxford University Press.
Dennis Clark (2010). The Gods as Henads in Iamblichus. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (1):54-74.
Samuel Sambursky (1971). The Concept of Time in Late Neoplatonism: Texts with Translation, Introd. And Notes. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Section of Humanities.
Michael J. Griffin (2012). What Has Aristotelian Dialectic to Offer a Neoplatonist? A Possible Sample of Iamblichus at Simplicius on the Categories 12,10-13,12. [REVIEW] International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 6 (2):173-185.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads6 ( #154,676 of 722,827 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,827 )
How can I increase my downloads?