David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Etica E Politica 5 (2):1-14 (2003)
This essay addresses the on-going controversy between supporters of minimal government, or minarchists, and supporters of no government, or anarchists. Both lay claim to the Libertarian principle, which holds that the only justification for the use of force is to deal with aggressive force initiated by someone else. Both agree that force is justified in dealing with aggressors. The only question is, who wields it, and how? The essay explains, briefly, the role of private property in all this. Private property is really just the operation of the liberty principle in the area of the use of things outside ourselves: those who initiate use of such things will have their activities subject to continual invasion unless property is recognized, and so property is the natural outcome of liberty, taken seriously. But the trouble is, states are monopolies, and maintain themselves at public expense, by taxation. This inevitably means interference with private property rights. And so, if we deal with aggressors via the state, we turn into partial aggressors ourselves, it seems. The essay points out that and why both minarchism and anarchism are virtually impossible in contemporary circumstances, but at the level of basic theory, at any rate, the anarchist appears to have the better of it
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Karl Widerquist (2009). A Dilemma for Libertarianism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (1):43-72.
John T. Sanders (1987). Justice and the Initial Acquisition of Property. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 10 (2):367-99.
John T. Sanders (2002). Projects and Property. In David Schmidtz (ed.), Robert Nozick. Cambridge University Press.
Jeremy Waldron (1990). The Right to Private Property. Clarendon Press.
William A. Galston (2007). Why the New Liberalism Isn't All That New, and Why the Old Liberalism Isn't What We Thought It Was. Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):289-305.
L. Wenar (1998). Original Acquisition of Private Property. Mind 107 (428):799-820.
Murray Hofmans-Sheard (2005). Preserving Common Rights Within Private Property. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):3-9.
Whitley Kaufman (2010). Self-Defense, Innocent Aggressors, and the Duty of Martyrdom. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (1):78-96.
Peter Vallentyne (2001). Self-Ownership. In Laurence Becker & Charlotte Becker (eds.), Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd edition. Garland Publishing.
Eric Mack (2006). Non-Absolute Rights and Libertarian Taxation. Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (2):109-141.
J. W. Harris (2002). Property and Justice. Oup Oxford.
Hugh Breakey (2011). Two Concepts of Property: Ownership of Things and Property in Activities. Philosophical Forum 42 (3):239-265.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads16 ( #114,007 of 1,410,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #95,293 of 1,410,305 )
How can I increase my downloads?