Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):297-314 (2002)
|Abstract||Ideas from cognitive science are increasingly influential and provide insight into the nature of moral judgement. Three core ideas are discussed: modern schema theory, the frequency of automatic decision-making and implicit processes as the default mode of human information processing. The Defining Issues Test (DIT) measures the beginnings of moral understanding, which are largely non-verbal and intuitive, in contrast to the Moral Judgement Interview (MJI), which measures the highest level of verbal understanding. The positive attributes of the DIT and its conceptualisation of moral judgement schemas are more apparent in a time of increasing respect for implicit knowledge and processing. The DIT offers a means of measuring moral judgement that fits with current views in cognitive science. Although the MJI and interview techniques generally are worthwhile for measuring production competence, the DIT is better able to measure understanding at the level that drives most decisions for most people|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James R. Rest, Darcia Narvaez, Stephen J. Thoma & Muriel J. Bebeau (2000). A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach to Morality Research. Journal of Moral Education 29 (4):381-395.
Patricia J. Craig & Sharon Nodie Oja (2012). Moral Judgement Changes Among Undergraduates in a Capstone Internship Experience. Journal of Moral Education 42 (1):43-70.
Judith A. Maccallum (1993). Teacher Reasoning and Moral Judgement in the Context of Student Discipline Situations. Journal of Moral Education 22 (1):3-17.
W. Pitt Derryberry & Stephen J. Thoma (2005). Functional Differences: Comparing Moral Judgement Developmental Phases of Consolidation and Transition. Journal of Moral Education 34 (1):89-106.
Fiona A. White (1996). Sources of Influence in Moral Thought: The New Moral Authority Scale. Journal of Moral Education 25 (4):421-439.
Muriel J. Bebeau (2002). The Defining Issues Test and the Four Component Model: Contributions to Professional Education. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):271-295.
Bill Puka (2002). The DIT and the 'Dark Side' of Development. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):339-352.
Patricia M. King & Matthew J. Mayhew (2002). Moral Judgement Development in Higher Education: Insights From the Defining Issues Test. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):247-270.
Wilton H. Bunch (2005). Changing Moral Judgement in Divinity Students. Journal of Moral Education 34 (3):363-370.
Darcia Narvaez (2001). Moral Text Comprehension: Implications for Education and Research. Journal of Moral Education 30 (1):43-54.
Dawn R. Elm & James Weber (1994). Measuring Moral Judgment: The Moral Judgment Interview or the Defining Issues Test? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (5):341 - 355.
Michael J. Pardales (2002). "So, How Did You Arrive at That Decision?" Connecting Moral Imagination and Moral Judgement. Journal of Moral Education 31 (4):423-437.
Glen Rogers (2002). Rethinking Moral Growth in College and Beyond. Journal of Moral Education 31 (3):325-338.
Maike Albertzart (2013). Principle-Based Moral Judgement. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):339-354.
Nigel Harvey (2001). Studying Judgement: General Issues. Thinking and Reasoning 7 (1):103 – 118.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-02
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?