Graduate studies at Western
Erkenntnis 60 (3):283-293 (2004)
|Abstract||The Logical Reconstruction of the World (Aufbau) is oneof the major works of Rudolf Carnap in which he attempts to put an end to some of the traditional disputes in epistemology by using what he calls 'construction theory'. According to this theory, one or more constructional systems can be designed in which all the scientific and pre-scientific objects are logically made out of a limited number of basic elements. Carnap introduces some options for the basis of this system and chooses the domain of the autopsychological, i.e., the domain of private elementary experiences, among them and tries to construct all the concepts out of them. This phenomenalistic reduction sometimes is seen as embracing a Cartesian dualism of mind and body or even a mentalistic monism. However, in this paper, I shall try to show that the traditional dualist-monist debates are among those disputes that the construction theory aims to get rid of. I will show that Carnap's position on the mind-body problem is really close to what Davidson later termed as 'Anomalous Monism' and that this is why Carnap fails to complete his logical construction at a crucial step. Whenever possible, logical constructions are to be substituted for inferred entities.|
|Keywords||Anomalous Construction Metaphysics Mind Monism Carnap|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
William M. Goodman (1985). Structures and Procedures. Philosophy Research Archives 11:551-578.
Mark Silcox, Mind and Anomalous Monism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Jaakko Hintikka (ed.) (1975). Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives. D. Reidel Pub. Co..
Hannes Leitgeb (2011). New Life for Carnap's "Aufbau?". Synthese 180 (2):265 - 299.
Jonathan Y. Tsou (2003). The Justification of Concepts in Carnap's Aufbau. Philosophy of Science 70 (4):671-689.
Rex Welshon (1999). Anomalous Monism and Epiphenomenalism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):103-120.
Ted Honderich (1982). The Argument for Anomalous Monism. Analysis 42 (January):59-64.
Sophie Gibb (2006). Why Davidson is Not a Property Epiphenomenalist. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (3):407 – 422.
Julie Yoo (2009). Anomalous Monism. In Brian P. McLaughlin, Ansgar Beckermann & Sven Walter (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind.
Christopher Pincock (2005). A Reserved Reading of Carnap's Aufbau. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):518–543.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #31,762 of 739,336 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #14,937 of 739,336 )
How can I increase my downloads?