International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):371-388 (2002)
|Abstract||Intellectual receptivity is both the prerequisite for objective human knowledge and the condition of possibility for all human knowledge. My arguments are cast in Thomistic terms. In the first part, I review the most important arguments with which Aquinas defends the receptivity of the human intellect, especially the argument from intellectual media and the argument from actualization. In the second part, I attempt to resolve the apparent contradictions involved in the claim that the intellect is receptive, contradictions that stem from the fact that the intellect is an active potency (since its proper act is to reason) and receptivity is the act of a passive potency. In the final part,I argue that knowledge of the proper object of the human intellect (material singulars) is possible if and only if the human intellect is receptive|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Catherine Jack Deavel (2009). Thomas Aquinas and Knowledge of Material Objects. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:269-278.
Mark Amorose (2001). Aristotle's Immortal Intellect. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:97-106.
David Torrijos-Castrillejo (2009). Más Allá de Aristóteles: Un Análisis Metafísico Del Entendimiento. El Dios de Aristóteles. νόησις νόησεως. Alfonso Pérez de Laborda (ed.) Ediciones de la Facultad de Teología san Dámaso.
Caery Evangelist (2011). Aquinas on Being and Essence As Proper Objects of the Intellect. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (3):361-390.
Gyula Klima (2009). Aquinas on the Materiality of the Human Soul and the Immateriality of the Human Intellect. Philosophical Investigations 32 (2):163-182.
Herbert A. Davidson (1992). Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes on Intellect: Their Cosmologies, Theories of the Active Intellect, and Theories of Human Intellect. Oxford University Press.
Lloyd P. Gerson (2004). The Unity of Intellect in Aristotle's De Anima. Phronesis 49 (4):348-373.
Lorelle Lamascus (2006). Aquinas and Themistius on Intellect. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:255-273.
Richard C. Taylor (2006). Abstraction in Al-Fârâbî. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:151-168.
Terence Kleven (1995). Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes on Intellect: Their Cosmologies, Theories of the Active Intellect, and Theories of Human Intellect (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (1):168-170.
Brian Francis Conolly (2007). Averroes, Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on How is Man Understands. Vivarium 45 (1):69-92.
Dan Haybron (2008). Happiness, the Self and Human Flourishing. Utilitas 20 (1):21-49.
Marilena Vlad (2007). De l'unité de l'intellect à l'un absolu. Chôra 5:121-139.
John E. Naus (1959). The Nature of the Practical Intellect According to Saint Thomas Aquinas. Roma, Università Gregoriana.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads4 ( #178,800 of 549,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,198 )
How can I increase my downloads?