David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1980)
A systematic study of rational or justified belief, which throws fresh light on current debates about foundations and coherence theories of knowledge, the validation of induction and moral scepticism. Dr Nathan focuses attention on the largely unsatisfiable desires for active and self-conscious assurance of truth liable to be engendered by philosophical reflection about total belief-systems and the sources of knowledge. He extracts a kernel of truth from the doctrine that a regress of justification is both necessary and impossible, contrasts the resultant scepticism with more familiar complaints about the inapplicability of supposedly essential cognitive concepts and explores the feasibility of non-Humean modes of consolation. This is an original and carefully constructed book, which will interest professional philosophers and advanced students of epistemology.
|Keywords||Evidence Justification (Theory of knowledge Belief and doubt Skepticism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$31.49 new (11% off) $31.49 direct from Amazon (11% off) $38.69 used Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Audi (1993). The Structure of Justification. Cambridge University Press.
Paul K. Moser (1989). Knowledge and Evidence. Cambridge University Press.
Andrew Naylor (1983). Justification in Memory Knowledge. Synthese 55 (2):269 - 286.
Angus Ross (1986). Why Do We Believe What We Are Told? Ratio (1):69-88.
Hamid Vahid (2009). The Epistemology of Belief. Palgrave Macmillan.
Stephen Hetherington, Fallibilism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
T. Dougherty (ed.) (2011). Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #220,749 of 1,012,312 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?