David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 53 (1):114-119 (1986)
Six recently discussed problems in discrete probabilistic sample space, which have been found puzzling and even paradoxical, are reexamined. The importance is stressed of a sharp distinction between the formalization of mathematical problems and their formal solution that, applied to probability theory, must lead through the explicit partitioning of a sample space. If this approach is consistently followed, such problems reveal themselves to be either inherently ambiguous, and therefore without solution, or quite straightforward. In both cases nothing remains of any sense of paradox
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Shinsuke Shimojo & Shin'Ichi Ichikawa (1989). Intuitive Reasoning About Probability: Theoretical and Experimental Analyses of the “Problem of Three Prisoners”. Cognition 32 (1):1-24.
Jean Baratgin & Guy Politzer (2007). The Psychology of Dynamic Probability Judgment: Order Effect, Normative Theories, and Experimental Methodology. Mind and Society 6 (1):53-66.
Similar books and articles
Patrick Suppes (1972). Some Open Problems in the Philosophy of Space and Time. Synthese 24 (1-2):298 - 316.
Mark Textor (2008). Samples as Symbols. Ratio 21 (3):344-359.
Stan Franklin & Max Garzon (1992). On Stability and Solvability (or, When Does a Neural Network Solve a Problem?). Minds and Machines 2 (1):71-83.
Haenni, R., Romeijn, J.-W., Wheeler, G. & Williamson, J., Probabilistic Logic and Probabilistic Networks.
Jonathan B. King (1993). Learning to Solve the Right Problems: The Case of Nuclear Power in America. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 12 (2):105 - 116.
Maya Bar-Hillel (1989). How to Solve Probability Teasers. Philosophy of Science 56 (2):348-358.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #179,736 of 1,906,956 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,378 of 1,906,956 )
How can I increase my downloads?