David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Mind and Behavior 15 (3):239-64 (1994)
This article treats of the distinction between objects and contents of pulses of consciousness - those minimal temporal sections of James's stream that give veridical or nonveridical consciousness of, or as though of, something, which can be anything perceivable, feelable, imaginable, thinkable, or internally apprehensible. The objects of pulses of consciousness are whatever the pulses mentally apprehend , whatever it is that they, by their occurrence, give awareness of respectively. Their contents are the particular ways in which they mentally apprehend their objects, or would mentally apprehend them in those cases in which their objects do not exist. I argue, inter alia, that not all pulses of consciousness have objects, though James holds that they all possess cognitive content; that centaurs can be neither objects nor contents of consciousness, since they do not, have not, and will not exist; and that some hallucinations whose objects are not physically present have objects anyway, such as a long lost relative or a historical figure. I consider four psychologists' views with which I disagree, views proposing a consciousness without content , a consciousness without objects , a consciousness of phenomenal items in a phenomenal environment , or a consciousness that systematically mistakes its constructed "objects" for their external counterparts
|Keywords||Consciousness Content Mental Metaphysics Object|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Athanassios Raftopoulos & Vincent C. Müller (2006). Nonconceptual Demonstrative Reference. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):251-285.
Alastair Hannay (1990). Human Consciousness. Routledge.
Galen Strawson (2003). What is the Relation Between an Experience, the Subject of the Experience, and the Content of the Experience? Philosophical Issues 13 (1):279-315.
Thomas Metzinger (2004). Peer Commentary on "Are There Neural Correlates of Consciousness": Appearance is Not Knowledge: The Incoherent Straw Man, Content-Content Confusions and Mindless Conscious Subjects. Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (1):67-72.
Ksenija Puškarić (2004). Crane on Intentionality and Consciousness. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):219-222.
Kazimierz Twardowski (1977). On the Content and Object of Presentations: A Psychological Investigation. Nijhoff.
Colin McGinn (1988). Consciousness and Content. Proceedings of the British Academy 74:219-39.
Robert van Gulick (2004). Peer Commentary on Are There Neural Correlates of Consciousness: Neural Correlates and the Diversity of Content. Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (1):82-86.
Edward T. Bartlett (1983). The Subjectlessness of Self-Consciousness. Philosophy Research Archives 9:675-682.
Jan Almäng (2013). Two Kinds of Time-Consciousness and Three Kinds of Content. Axiomathes 23 (1):61-80.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #484,599 of 1,410,170 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #155,015 of 1,410,170 )
How can I increase my downloads?