On the intrinsic nature of states of consciousness: Further considerations in the light of James's conception
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Emotion 1 (1):139-166 (2000)
How are the states of consciousness intrinsically so that they all qualify as ?feelings? in William James?s generic sense? Only a small, propaedeutic part of what is required to address the intrinsic nature of such states can be accomplished here. I restrict my topic mainly to a certain characteristic that belongs to each of those pulses of mentality that successively make up James?s stream of consciousness. Certain statements of James?s are intended to pick out the variable ?width? belonging to a stream of consciousness as it flows. Attention to this proposed property brings me to a discussion of (a) the unitary character of each of the states of consciousness however complex they may frequently be and (b) how to conceive of their complexity without recourse to a misleading spatial metaphor
|Keywords||*Consciousness States *Emotional States *James (William)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Yoshihisa Kashima, Aparna Kanakatte Gurumurthy, Lucette Ouschan, Trevor Chong & Jason Mattingley (2007). Connectionism and Self: James, Mead, and the Stream of Enculturated Consciousness. Psychological Inquiry 18 (2):73-96.
Valerie Gray Hardcastle (2003). Attention Versus Consciousness: A Distinction with a Difference. In Naoyuki Osaka (ed.), Neural Basis of Consciousness. John Benjamins 105.
Dan Lloyd (2000). Beyond “the Fringe”: A Cautionary Critique of William James. Consciousness and Cognition 9 (4):629-637.
Thomas Natsoulas (2001). On the Intrinsic Nature of States of Consciousness: Attempted Inroads From the First Person Perspective. Journal of Mind and Behavior 22 (3):219-248.
Thomas Natsoulas (2006). On the Temporal Continuity of Human Consciousness: Is James's Firsthand Description, After All, "Inept"? Journal of Mind and Behavior 27 (2):121-148.
Andrew R. Bailey (1999). Beyond the Fringe: William James on the Transitive Parts of the Stream of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (2-3):141-53.
Thomas Natsoulas (2003). The Stream of Consciousness: XXVIII. Does Consciousness Exist? (First Part). Imagination, Cognition and Personality 23 (2):121-141.
James A. Russell (2005). Emotion in Human Consciousness is Built on Core Affect. Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (8-10):26-42.
Thomas Natsoulas (2000). The Stream of Consciousness: XXII. Apprehension and the Feeling Aspect. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 20 (3):275-295.
Thomas Natsoulas (2002). On the Intrinsic Nature of States of Consciousness: O'Shaughnessy and the Mythology of the Attention. Consciousness and Emotion 3 (1):35-64.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #121,909 of 1,911,611 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,720 of 1,911,611 )
How can I increase my downloads?