Journal of Ethics 13 (4) (2009)
|Abstract||This paper examines whether patriotism and other forms of group partiality can be justified and what are the moral limits on actions performed to benefit countries and other groups. In particular, I ask whether partiality toward one’s country (or other groups) can justify attacking enemy civilians to achieve victory or other political goals. Using a rule utilitarian approach, I then (a) defend the legitimacy of “moderate” patriotic partiality but (b) argue that noncombatant immunity imposes an absolute constraint on what may be done to promote the interests of a country or other group involved in warfare or other forms of violent conflict.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard W. Miller (1997). Killing for the Homeland: Patriotism, Nationalism and Violence. Journal of Ethics 1 (2):165-185.
Diane Jeske (1997). Friendship, Virtue, and Impartiality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):51-72.
S. Macedo (2011). Just Patriotism? Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (4):413-423.
Richard Arneson (2003). Consequentialism Vs. Special-Ties Partiality. The Monist 86 (3):382-401.
Michael Stingl & John Collier (2005). Reasonable Partiality From a Biological Point of View. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (1-2):11 - 24.
Igor Primorac (2004). Patriotism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):81-98.
Brenda Almond (2005). Reasonable Partiality in Professional Relationships. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (1-2):155 - 168.
Robert Heeger (2005). Reasonable Partiality to Domestic Animals. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (1-2):123 - 139.
Added to index2009-11-07
Total downloads51 ( #20,517 of 549,062 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,062 )
How can I increase my downloads?