Stoics and sceptics: A reply to Brueckner
Analysis 64 (283):264–268 (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesA. A. Long (1986). Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics. University of California Press.
Eduard Zeller (1962). The Stoics, Epicureans, and Sceptics. New York, Russell & Russell.
Paul Noordhof (2005). The Transmogrification of a Posteriori Knowledge: Reply to Brueckner. Analysis 65 (285):88-89.
Robert J. Rabel (1998). Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics. Ancient Philosophy 18 (1):199-201.
Patrick Shade (1999). Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics. Teaching Philosophy 22 (1):80-84.
Timothy Williamson (1997). Reply to Commentators. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):945-953.
Harold W. Noonan (2006). Non-Branching and Circularity -- Reply to Brueckner. Analysis 66 (290):163-167.
Edwyn Robert Bevan (1979). Stoics and Sceptics. Arno Press.
E. Vernon Arnold (1914). Stoics and Sceptics Stoics and Sceptics: Four Lectures Delivered in Oxford During Hilary Term, 1913, for the Common University Fund. By Edwyn Bevan, Sometime Scholar of the New College, Oxford. . Pp. 152. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1913. 4s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 28 (02):62-63.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads10 ( #106,150 of 548,972 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
