|Abstract||Are any of our beliefs justified? Are they rational? The skeptic thinks that our epistemic justifications are undeserved. Nicholas Nathan confronts the skeptic and questions the value of his argument. Skeptical arguments are against justified and rational belief as well as for ignorance. Nathan argues that the truth value of trivial arguments are a matter of indifference. He tests this conjecture with a varied collection of counterexamples: arguments for ignorance, neo-Cartesian and infinite regress arguments, and also more critically with arguments against justified and rational belief.|
|Keywords||Belief and doubt|
|Buy the book||$27.18 used (81% off) $114.95 new (17% off) $138.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BD215.N47 2000|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Leigh Sales (2009). On Doubt. Melbourne University Pub..
J. L. Schellenberg (2007). The Wisdom to Doubt: A Justification of Religious Skepticism. Cornell University Press.
Arthur James Balfour (1926). Familiar Beliefs and Transcendent Reason. London, Pub. For the British Academy by H. Milford, Oxford University Press.
Andrew D. Cling (2003). Self-Supporting Arguments. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):279–303.
Adam Leite (2005). A Localist Solution to the Regress of Epistemic Justification. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (3):395 – 421.
Peter L. Berger (2009). In Praise of Doubt: How to Have Convictions Without Becoming a Fanatic. Harperone/Harpercollins Publishers.
David Phiroze Christensen (2004). Putting Logic in its Place: Formal Constraints on Rational Belief. Oxford University Press.
N. M. L. Nathan (1980). Evidence and Assurance. Cambridge University Press.
Joshua Schechter (2013). Rational Self-Doubt and the Failure of Closure. Philosophical Studies 163 (2):428-452.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #113,901 of 548,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?