David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Semantics 18 (1):27-81 (2001)
In this paper Dynamic Event Semantics, DES, is presented. DES is based on the intuition that non-stative verbs express changes. The notion of change can be made precise in at least two different, yet complementary ways. It is either an object (event, action) or a transformation of state: a state s at which a result Q does not hold is transformed into a state s′ at which Q holds. An event can bring about more than one result. Each result is of a particular type that determines how it is evaluated on the execution sequences of events of a given type. The way a result is evaluated on the execution sequences of events that bring it about corresponds to a dynamic mode from Dynamic Modal Logic, which, in turn, is closely related to a type of program from Dynamic Logic. Verbs belonging to one aspectual class are characterized by determining the same types of results. Aspectual classes can therefore, at least partially, be defined in terms of types of results, or, equivalently, in terms of the dynamic modes corresponding to these types
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Bridget Copley & Heidi Harley (2015). A Force-Theoretic Framework for Event Structure. Linguistics and Philosophy 38 (2):103-158.
Similar books and articles
R. Naumann (2003). Constraining the Combinatorial Patterns of Japanese V-V Compounds: An Analysis in Dynamic Event Semantics. Journal of Semantics 20 (3):275-296.
C. F. M. Vermeulen (1993). Sequence Semantics for Dynamic Predicate Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2 (3):217-254.
C. F. M. Vermeulen (1995). Merging Without Mystery Or: Variables in Dynamics Semantics. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (4):405 - 450.
Paul Gochet (2002). The Dynamic Turn in Twentieth Century Logic. Synthese 130 (2):175 - 184.
Jaroslav Peregrin (ed.) (2003). Meaning: The Dynamic Turn. Elsevier Science.
Steven Davis & Brendan S. Gillon (eds.) (2004). Semantics: A Reader. Oxford University Press.
Daniel Rothschild (2011). Explaining Presupposition Projection with Dynamic Semantics. Semantics and Pragmatics 4 (3):1-43.
Berit Brogaard (2012). Context and Content: Pragmatics in Two-Dimensional Semantics. In Keith Allan & Kasia Jaszczolt (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press
José Júlio Alferes, Federico Banti, Antonio Brogi & João Alexandre Leite (2005). The Refined Extension Principle for Semantics of Dynamic Logic Programming. Studia Logica 79 (1):7 - 32.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads14 ( #255,513 of 1,906,921 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,570 of 1,906,921 )
How can I increase my downloads?