From Universals to Topics: The Realism of Rudolph Agricola, with an Edition of his Reply to a Critic

Vivarium 50 (2):190-224 (2012)
Abstract
Rudolph Agricola’s De inventione dialectica has rightly been regarded as the most original and influential textbook on argumentation, reading, writing, and communication in the Renaissance. At the heart of his treatment are the topics ( loci ), such as definition, genus, species, place, whole, parts, similars, and so on. While their function in Agricola’s system is argumentative and rhetorical, the roots of the topics are metaphysical, as Agricola himself explicitly acknowledges. It has led scholars to characterize Agricola as a realist or even an extreme realist. This article studies two little treatises on universals by Agricola that throw further light on his realism. It is suggested that they could be viewed as an early step in his long-term project of revising and re-organizing the systems of topics as he encountered them in Aristotle, Cicero, and Boethius. The article offers a close analysis of the treatises, suggesting that Agricola’s realism owes a (general) debt to the school of the Scotists. In both earlier and later work Agricola emphasizes the common aspects of things that enable us to categorize and talk about things without denying their fundamental unicity and individuality. An edition of Agricola’s second treatise on universals—a reply to a critic—is added
Keywords topics   humanism   universals   dialectic   Agricola   Duns Scotus
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,999
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Peter Mack (1985). Rudolph Agricola's Reading of Literature. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 48:23-41.
John Monfasani (1990). Lorenzo Valla and Rudolph Agricola. Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (2):181-200.
Gerhard Mathé (1994). Agricola Und Die Geologie. NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 2 (1):13-26.
Wolfhard Weber (1994). Georgius Agricola, Begründer der Montanwissenschaften. NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 2 (1):1-12.
R. H. Martin (1963). The Agricola. The Classical Review 13 (01):77-.
A. R. Burn (1968). A New Agricola. The Classical Review 18 (03):314-.
Nicholas Reed (1976). Agricola 24.2. Classical Quarterly 26 (01):115-.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-07-17

Total downloads

10 ( #146,084 of 1,101,095 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #34,441 of 1,101,095 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.