Participation in the organization: An ethical analysis from the papal social tradition [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 14 (11):923 - 935 (1995)
How one structures an organization is not only important from the perspective of productivity and efficiency, but primarily how it affects the moral formation of those who are employed in that organization. Organizational structures whether in the manufacturing, service or non-profit sector have moral dimensions that cannot be escaped. Papal social tradition has been concerned about the moral formation of all workers within the organization. This tradition has maintained that an essential component to a humane organizational structure is participation of those involved in the organization, and consequently that participation must be understood primarily in terms of the formation of employees. This article explores the papal social tradition''s understanding of participation and examines its significance in today''s organizational environment, particularly in reference to work-teams.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jim Wishloff (2009). The Land of Realism and the Shipwreck of Idea-Ism: Thomas Aquinas and Milton Friedman on the Social Responsibilities of Business. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):137 - 155.
Nicholas J. C. Santos & Gene R. Laczniak (2009). "Just" Markets From the Perspective of Catholic Social Teaching. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1):29 - 38.
Similar books and articles
Steven P. Feldman (2000). Management Ethics Without the Past: Rationalism and Individualism in Critical Organization Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (3):623-643.
Erika Summers-Effler (2007). Vortexes of Involvement: Social Systems as Turbulent Flow. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (4):433-448.
Randall S. Upchurch & Sheila K. Ruhland (1996). The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates in Lodging Operations as Perceived by General Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (10):1083 - 1093.
Christine M. Riordan, Robert D. Gatewood & JodiBarnes Bill (1997). Corporate Image: Employee Reactions and Implications for Managing Corporate Social Performance. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (4):401-412.
C. Cullinan, Dennis Bline, Robert Farrar & Dana Lowe (2008). Organization-Harm Vs. Organization-Gain Ethical Issues: An Exploratory Examination of the Effects of Organizational Commitment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 80 (2):225 - 235.
Sean Valentine, Lynn Godkin & Margaret Lucero (2002). Ethical Context, Organizational Commitment, and Person-Organization Fit. Journal of Business Ethics 41 (4):349 - 360.
Tim Scott (2010). Organization Philosophy: Gehlen, Foucault, Deleuze. Palgrave Macmillan.
Richard P. Nielsen & Ron Dufresne (2005). Can Ethical Organizational Character Be Stimulated and Enabled?: “Upbuilding” Dialog as Crisis Management Method. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 57 (4):311 - 326.
Howard Adelman (1991). Morality and Ethics in Organizational Administration. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (9):665 - 678.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #182,838 of 1,098,129 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #78,521 of 1,098,129 )
How can I increase my downloads?