David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):533-547 (2011)
Oppression can be unjust from a luck egalitarian point of view even when it is the consequence of choices for which it is reasonable to hold persons responsible. This is for two reasons. First, people who have not been oppressed are unlikely to anticipate the ways in which their choices may lead them into oppressive conditions. Facts about systematic phenomena (like oppression) are often beyond the epistemic reach of persons who are not currently subject to such conditions, even when they possess adequate information about the particular consequences of their choices. Second, people may be (much) less responsible for remaining in oppressive conditions, even if they are responsible for entering circumstances of oppression. Oppression that results from a person’s choice may cause or contribute to dramatic changes in that person, and these changes may be sufficient to undermine the person’s responsibility for the results of her earlier choice.
|Keywords||Choice Equality Luck egalitarianism Oppression Responsibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Derek Parfit (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press.
Iris Marion Young (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press.
Elizabeth S. Anderson (1999). What is the Point of Equality? Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
G. A. Cohen (1989). On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Ethics 99 (4):906-944.
Citations of this work BETA
Carl Knight (2013). Egalitarian Justice and Expected Value. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (5):1061-1073.
Carl Knight (2015). Abandoning the Abandonment Objection: Luck Egalitarian Arguments for Public Insurance. Res Publica 21 (2):119-135.
Hugh Lazenby (2014). Luck, Risk and the Market. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):667-680.
Similar books and articles
Lisa Tessman (2009). Expecting Bad Luck. Hypatia 24 (1):9-28.
Susan Wendell (1990). Oppression and Victimization; Choice and Responsibility. Hypatia 5 (3):15 - 46.
Patrick Tomlin (2013). Choices Chance and Change: Luck Egalitarianism Over Time. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):393-407.
Ryan Long (2011). The Incompleteness of Luck Egalitarianism. Social Philosophy Today 27:87-96.
Gideon Elford (2013). Equality of Opportunity and Other-Affecting Choice: Why Luck Egalitarianism Does Not Require Brute Luck Equality. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):139-149.
Charles Scott (2012). Freedom and Oppression in North America. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):1-13.
Mary Kate McGowan (2009). Oppressive Speech. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):389 – 407.
Lani Roberts (1997). One Oppression or Many? Philosophy in the Contemporary World 4 (1/2):41-47.
Joseph Westfall (2000). What is Cyberwoman?: The Second Sex in Cyberspace. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 2 (3):159-166.
Elizabeth Sperry (2009). Autonomy Luck. Social Philosophy Today 25:165-178.
Gideon Elford (2012). Men Who Would Be Kings. Social Theory and Practice 38 (2):193-212.
Claudia Card (1998). Radicalesbianfeminist Theory. Hypatia 13 (1):206 - 213.
Kristin Voigt (2007). The Harshness Objection: Is Luck Egalitarianism Too Harsh on the Victims of Option Luck? [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):389 - 407.
Added to index2011-01-14
Total downloads86 ( #48,867 of 1,906,923 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #49,468 of 1,906,923 )
How can I increase my downloads?