What the classical English school was trying to explain, and why its members were not interested in causal explanation
In Cornelia Navari (ed.), Theorising International Society: English School Methods. Palgrave Macmillan (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMichael Strevens (2008). Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation. Harvard University Press.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (2012). Against the Contrastive Account of Singular Causation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (1):115-143.
Scott R. Sehon (1997). Deviant Causal Chains and the Irreducibility of Teleological Explanation. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):195–213.
Mariam Thalos (2002). Explanation is a Genus: An Essay on the Varieties of Scientific Explanation. Synthese 130 (3):317 - 354.
Mark Risjord (2005). Reasons, Causes, and Action Explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (3):294-306.
Rebecca Schweder (2005). A Defense of a Unificationist Theory of Explanation. Foundations of Science 10 (4).
Michael Rota (2007). Infinite Causal Chains and Explanation. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:109-122.
Scott R. Sehon (2000). An Argument Against the Causal Theory of Action Explanation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):67-85.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-09-15Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
