David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Society 67 (3):303 - 328 (2003)
Analysis of the Turkish state in the 20th century both draws upon and supports Gramsci's definition of the state as "dictatorship + hegemony." Both the form of the capitalist state and its activities rest upon the hegemony of the dominant class. The importance of society and class conflicts in understanding the capitalist state suggests a critical position vis-à-vis the state autonomy tradition. The history of the Turkish state provides support for the argument that the dominant class must have established hegemony in the state in the first place, since without this there is no guarantee of successful use of the coercive power of the state on behalf of the sectional interests of the dominant class.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
William I. Robinson (2005). Gramsci and Globalisation: From Nation‐State to Transnational Hegemony. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):559-574.
Raju J. Das (1996). State Theories: A Critical Analysis. Science and Society 60 (1):27 - 57.
Mehmet Tabak (2000). Marx's Theory of Proletarian Dictatorship Revisited. Science and Society 64 (3):333 - 356.
Samuel DeCanio (2000). Beyond Marxist State Theory: State Autonomy in Democratic Societies. Critical Review 14 (2-3):215-236.
William I. Robinson (2005). Global Capitalism: The New Transnationalism and the Folly of Conventional Thinking. Science and Society 69 (3):316 - 328.
Milton Fisk (1985). The State and the Market in Rawls. Studies in East European Thought 30 (4):347-364.
Charles A. Hart (1940). Philosophy of the State: The Individual; Civil Rights; the Democratic State; the Totalitarian State; the Corporative State; Church and State. [Washington, D.C.,G. Dawe].
Bob Jessop (2005). Gramsci as a Spatial Theorist. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):421-437.
E. F. Keyman (2012). Rethinking the 'Kurdish Question' in Turkey: Modernity, Citizenship and Democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (4-5):467-476.
Jieli Li (2002). State Fragmentation: Toward a Theoretical Understanding of the Territorial Power of the State. Sociological Theory 20 (2):139-156.
Murray Rothbard (1977). Robert Nozick and the Immaculate Conception of the State. Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):45-57.
Charles Sayward & Wayne Wasserman (1981). Has Nozick Justified the State? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (4):411-415.
Tayyab Mahmud & Ratna Kapur, Hegemony, Coercion, and Their Teeth-Grinding Harmony: A Commentary on Power, Culture, and Sexuality in Franco's Spain.
Leonard Brewster (2002). The Impossibility of the State. Journal of Libertarian Studies 16 (3; SEAS SUM):19-34.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads12 ( #141,736 of 1,413,434 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,636 of 1,413,434 )
How can I increase my downloads?