David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):251-261 (2010)
We describe the ongoing citations to biomedical articles affected by scientific misconduct, and characterize the papers that cite these affected articles. The citations to 102 articles named in official findings of scientific misconduct during the period of 1993 and 2001 were identified through the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science database. Using a stratified random sampling strategy, we performed a content analysis of 603 of the 5,393 citing papers to identify indications of awareness that the cited articles affected by scientific misconduct had validity issues, and to examine how the citing papers referred to the affected articles. Fewer than 5% of citing papers indicated any awareness that the cited article was retracted or named in a finding of misconduct. We also tested the hypothesis that affected articles would have fewer citations than a comparison sample; this was not supported. Most articles affected by misconduct were published in basic science journals, and we found little cause for concern that such articles may have affected clinical equipoise or clinical care.
|Keywords||Bibliometric analysis Journalology Journal citations Quantitative content analysis Retraction Scientific misconduct|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Charisse R. Madlock-Brown & David Eichmann (2015). The Impact of Retraction on Citation Networks. Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):127-137.
Douglas Cromey (2010). Avoiding Twisted Pixels: Ethical Guidelines for the Appropriate Use and Manipulation of Scientific Digital Images. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):639-667.
Similar books and articles
Eleanor G. Shore (1995). Effectiveness of Research Guidelines in Prevention of Scientific Misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):383-387.
Lawrence Souder (2010). A Rhetorical Analysis of Apologies for Scientific Misconduct: Do They Really Mean It? Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):175-184.
Samuel Tilden (2010). Incarceration, Restitution, and Lifetime Debarment: Legal Consequences of Scientific Misconduct in the Eric Poehlman Case. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):737-741.
Stephanie J. Bird & Alicia K. Dustira (1999). Misconduct in Science: Controversy and Progress. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):131-136.
Benjamin K. Sovacool (2005). Using Criminalization and Due Process to Reduce Scientific Misconduct. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):W1-W7.
Gisèle Chevalier & Richard Hudson (2001). The Use of Intentional Language in Scientific Articles in Finance. Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (2):203-228.
Valerie Gray Hardcastle (1999). Scientific Papers Have Various Structures. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):415-439.
Jong Yong Abdiel Foo (2009). A Study on Journal Self-Citations and Intra-Citing Within the Subject Category of Multidisciplinary Sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):491-501.
P. J. D. Drenth (2006). Responsible Conduct in Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):13-21.
Anne Victoria Neale, Justin Northrup, Rhonda Dailey, Ellen Marks & Judith Abrams (2007). Correction and Use of Biomedical Literature Affected by Scientific Misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):5-24.
Added to index2009-07-18
Total downloads25 ( #159,094 of 1,911,320 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #178,269 of 1,911,320 )
How can I increase my downloads?