David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
AI and Society 28 (1):65-73 (2013)
Usually, the shape of the future is seen as the result of a cultural flow that, according to some privileged cultural variable, like technology, goes undisturbed towards its own outcome. This is a quite naive attitude that has been very rarely successful. Both conventional technology and technology of the artificial show that, within culture, ‘demons’ are always active trying to exploit or even bypass standards in order to give birth to unexpected novelties. This is true within the pure technology area and even more in its artistic extensions. Therefore, no deterministic process is going on but, rather, a permanent remixing of chances that makes any prophecy impossible.
|Keywords||Culture Artificial Technology Aesthetics Standardization|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Herbert A. Simon (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. [Cambridge, M.I.T. Press.
Joseph Needham (1958). Science and Civilization in China. Science and Society 22 (1):74-77.
G. Tarde (1890). Les Lois de l'Imitation. Mind 15 (59):404-411.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lauge Baungaard Rasmussen (2013). Cultural Visions of Technology. AI and Society 28 (2):177-188.
Peter D. Hershock, M. T. Stepani͡ant͡s & Roger T. Ames (eds.) (2003). Technology and Cultural Values: On the Edge of the Third Millennium. East-West Philosophers Conference.
Hans Sachsse (1983). Cultural Philosophy of Technology. Perspectives on Technology—Mankind—Future. Philosophy and History 16 (1):8-9.
Peter Janich (2003). Technology and Levels of Culture. Poiesis and Praxis 1 (4):263-273.
Daniel Memmi (2013). Cultural Consequences of Computing Technology. AI and Society 28 (1):77-85.
Rayvon Fouché (ed.) (2007). Technology Studies. Sage Publications.
Seungbae Park (2011). Defence of Cultural Relativism. Cultura 8 (1):159-170.
Jeremiah Conway (2010). The Liberal Arts and Contemporary Culture. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):4-11.
John D. Greenwood (1999). From Volkerpsychologie to Cultural Psychology: The Once and Future Discipline? Philosophical Psychology 12 (4):503 – 514.
Andrew Feenberg (1992). Subversive Rationalization: Technology, Power, and Democracy. Inquiry 35 (3 & 4):301 – 322.
Kimball P. Marshall (1999). Has Technology Introduced New Ethical Problems? Journal of Business Ethics 19 (1):81 - 90.
Laura Verdi (2008). The Arts and the Future City. World Futures 64 (1):34 – 42.
Janet Malek (2006). Identity, Harm, and the Ethics of Reproductive Technology. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (1):83 – 95.
Karamjit S. Gill (2002). Knowledge Networking in Cross-Cultural Settings. AI and Society 16 (3):252-277.
Y. Rav (2008). Pierre Cassou-Nogues. Les Demons de Godel: Logique Et Folie. [Godel's Demons: Logic and Craziness]. Philosophia Mathematica 17 (1):116-120.
Added to index2012-02-15
Total downloads5 ( #529,304 of 1,934,805 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,672 of 1,934,805 )
How can I increase my downloads?