David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and the Environment 3 (1):55 - 80 (1998)
In this paper, I argue that all value is rooted in the interests of valuing beings. If something satisfies an interest of a valuing entity by contributing to its well-being in some way, then it has value. Anything that fails to satisfy any interests is entirely lacking in value. I defend this conception of value by showing that the usual arguments directed against this kind of view are lacking of force, and by considering various other theories of value and showing that they suffer from serious problems. Finally, I clarify some important distinctions between intrinsic, extrinsic, inherent, and instrumental value.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Warren Neill (1998). An Emotocentric Theory of Interests. Environmental Ethics 20 (2):163-182.
David M. Holley (2002). Self-Interest and Integrity. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (1):5-22.
Mark E. Jonas (2011). Dewey's Conception of Interest and its Significance for Teacher Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (2):112-129.
Andrew Youpa (2010). Spinoza's Theories of Value. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (2):209 – 229.
Alasdair Cochrane (2007). Animal Rights and Animal Experiments: An Interest-Based Approach. Res Publica 13 (3):293-318.
Petri Ylikoski (2004). Interests, Folk Psychology and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Philosophical Explorations 7 (3):265 – 279.
Liam Shields (2016). How Bad Can a Good Enough Parent Be? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):163-182.
Christian Piller (2009). Valuing Knowledge: A Deontological Approach. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):413 - 428.
Timothy Macklem & John Gardner (2006). Value, Interest, and Well-Being. Utilitas 18 (4):362-382.
R. B. Brandt (1991). Overvold on Self-Interest and Self-Sacrifice. Journal of Philosophical Research 16:353-363.
Gerald J. Postema (2006). Interests, Universal and Particular: Bentham's Utilitarian Theory of Value. Utilitas 18 (2):109-133.
David Owens (2011). The Possibility of Consent. Ratio 24 (4):402-421.
Michael S. Merry (2007). The Well-Being of Children, the Limits of Paternalism, and the State: Can Disparate Interests Be Reconciled? Ethics and Education 2 (1):39-59.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads6 ( #541,987 of 1,940,952 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,800 of 1,940,952 )
How can I increase my downloads?