Emotional responses to fiction: Reply to Radford
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (1):75-78 (1995)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJames Harold (2010). Mixed Feelings: Conflicts in Emotional Responses to Film. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 34 (1):280-294.
Aaron Smuts (2010). The Ghost is the Thing: Can Fiction Reveal Audience Belief? Midwest Studies in Philosophy 34 (1):219-239.
Michael Lacewing (2005). Emotional Self-Awareness and Ethical Deliberation. Ratio 18 (1):65-81.
David H. Sanford (1966). Red, Green and Absolute Determinacy: A Reply to C. Radford's Incompatibilities of Colours. Philosophical Quarterly 16 (October):356-358.
Joseph T. Palencik (2008). Emotion and the Force of Fiction. Philosophy and Literature 32 (2):pp. 258-277.
R. Joyce (2000). Rational Fear of Monsters. British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (2):209-224.
Jinhee Choi (2003). All the Right Responses: Fiction Films and Warranted Emotions. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (3):308-321.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads24 ( #51,701 of 549,162 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,162 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
