An examination of D m Armstrong's theory of perception

American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (April):154-160 (1964)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Belief  Epistemology  Hallucination  Object  Perception  Realism  Scepticism  Sense Impression  Armstrong, D
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Max Deutscher (1963). David Armstrong and Perception. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (May):80-88.
    David M. Armstrong (1963). Max Deutscher and Perception. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (August):246-249.
    Brice N. Fleming (1962). The Nature of Perception. Review of Metaphysics 16 (December):259-295.
    John A. Foster (2004). Reply to Armstrong. Harvard Review of Philosophy 12 (1):27-28.
    J. Barry Maund (1976). The Non-Sensuous Epistemic Account of Perception. American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (January):57-62.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2009-01-28

    Total downloads

    8 ( #138,633 of 1,089,153 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,735 of 1,089,153 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.