An examination of D m Armstrong's theory of perception
American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (April):154-160 (1964)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Belief Epistemology Hallucination Object Perception Realism Scepticism Sense Impression Armstrong, D | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFrank Jackson (1977). Perception: A Representative Theory. Cambridge University Press.
John A. Foster (2004). Reply to Armstrong. Harvard Review of Philosophy 12 (1):27-28.
Brice N. Fleming (1962). The Nature of Perception. Review of Metaphysics 16 (December):259-295.
David M. Armstrong (1963). Max Deutscher and Perception. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (August):246-249.
Georges Dicker (1980). Perceptual Knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Maurice Charlesworth (1979). Sense-Impressions: A New Model. Mind 88 (January):24-44.
Norman P. Melchert (1973). A Note on the Belief Theory of Perception. Philosophical Studies 24 (November):427-429.
David M. Armstrong (1961). Perception And The Physical World. Humanities Press.
Max Deutscher (1963). David Armstrong and Perception. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (May):80-88.
J. Barry Maund (1976). The Non-Sensuous Epistemic Account of Perception. American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (January):57-62.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #114,230 of 549,694 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,337 of 549,694 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
