American Philosophical Quarterly 35 (1):87-100 (1998)
|Abstract||According to the cosmological argument, there must be a self-existent being, because, if every being were a dependent being, we would lack an explanation of the fact that there are any dependent beings at all, rather than nothing. This argument faces an important, but little-noticed objection: If self-existent beings may exist, why may not also self-explanatory facts also exist? And if self-explanatory facts may exist, why may not the fact that there are any dependent beings be a self-explanatory fact? And if that fact is self-explanatory, why make recourse to self-existent beings? This line of questioning is surprisingly hard to answer, but I find resources for an answer in Bertrand Russell's logical atomism.|
|Keywords||theistic argument cosmological argument Clarke, Samuel Russell, Bertrand Rowe, William logical atomism principle of sufficient reason self-explanatory facts|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert C. Koons (1997). A New Look at the Cosmological Argument. American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (2):193 - 211.
Alexander Pruss (1999). A New Cosmological Argument. Religious Studies 35 (4):461 - 476.
Elmar J. Kremer (1997). The Cosmological Argument Without the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Faith and Philosophy 14 (1):62-70.
Patrick Francken & Heimir Geirsson (1999). Regresses, Sufficient Reasons, and Cosmological Arguments. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:285-304.
Mark T. Nelson (1996). The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Moral Argument. Religious Studies 32 (1):15-26.
Ian Proops (2011). Logical Atomism in Russell and Wittgenstein. In Oskari Kuusela & Marie McGinn (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oup Oxford.
Wayne A. Patterson (1996). The Logical Structure of Russell's Negative Facts. Russell 16 (1):45 - 66.
Seyed Hassan Hosseini (2011). A Comparative Study on the Degree of Dependence of Clarke's and Sadra's Arguments for the Existence of God on the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Hekmat Va Falsafeh 6 (24):53 - 68.
Graham Oppy (2000). On ‘a New Cosmological Argument’. Religious Studies 36 (3):345-353.
William Lane Craig (2011). Graham Oppy on the Kalam Cosmological Argument. International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):303-330.
Tyron Goldschmidt (2011). The New Cosmological Argument: O'Connor on Ultimate Explanation. Philosophia 39 (2):267-288.
Alexander Rosenberg (1989). Russell Versus Steiner on Physics and Causality. Philosophy of Science 56 (2):341-347.
William L. Rowe (1968). The Cosmological Argument and the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Man and World 1 (2):278-292.
Anthony Brueckner (2001). Van Inwagen on the Cosmological Argument. Philosophical Papers 30 (1):31-40.
William Lane Craig (2006). J. Howard Sobel on the Kalam Cosmological Argument. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (4):565-84.
Added to index2011-02-17
Total downloads82 ( #11,433 of 722,815 )
Recent downloads (6 months)50 ( #1,165 of 722,815 )
How can I increase my downloads?