Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):81-82 (1998)
|Abstract||Millikan's theory of substance concepts has advantages for psychological theories, including those in cognitive development. However, the disadvantage is that it cannot be generalized even to some of the most common concepts that children acquire in the early years of life. For a general theory we must get beyond substances.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ruth Garrett Millikan (1999). On Sympathies with J. J. Gibson and on Focusing Reference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):732-733.
Edouard Machery (2009). Doing Without Concepts. Oxford University Press.
Warren Schmaus (2005). Evolutionary and Neuroscience Approaches to the Study of Cognition. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):675-686.
Niko Scharer (1998). Can Mere Phonemes Be Components of Millikan's Substance Concepts? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):83-84.
Ruth Garrett Millikan (1998). Words, Concepts, and Entities: With Enemies Like These, I Don't Need Friends. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):89-100.
Jürgen Schröder (1998). Explanatory Force, Antidescriptionism, and the Common Structure of Substance Concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):84-85.
Ruth Garrett Millikan (2000). On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay About Substance Concepts. Cambridge University Press.
Justin Broackes (2006). Substance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (1):131–166.
Carol Slater (1998). More Me? Substance Concepts and Self Concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):85-85.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #155,249 of 754,397 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?