Confronting deep moral disagreement: The president's council on bioethics, moral status, and human embryos
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):33 – 42 (2005)
The report of the President's Council on Bioethics, Human Cloning and Human Dignity, addresses the central ethical, political, and policy issue in human embryonic stem cell research: the moral status of extracorporeal human embryos. The Council members were in sharp disagreement on this issue and essentially failed to adequately engage and respectfully acknowledge each others' deepest moral concerns, despite their stated commitment to do so. This essay provides a detailed critique of the two extreme views on the Council (i.e., embryos have full moral status or they have none at all) and then gives theoretical grounding for our judgment about the intermediate moral status of embryos. It also supplies an account of how to address profound moral disagreements in the public arena, especially by way of constructing a middle ground that deliberately pays sincere respect to the views of those with whom it has deep disagreements
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Paul W. Taylor (2011). Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton University Press.
Tom Regan (2009). The Case for Animal Rights. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press 425-434.
John Rawls (1999). Collected Papers. Harvard University Press.
Mary Anne Warren (1997). Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things. Clarendon Press.
Kenneth E. Goodpaster (1978). On Being Morally Considerable. Journal of Philosophy 75 (6):308-325.
Citations of this work BETA
Toby Ord (2008). The Scourge: Moral Implications of Natural Embryo Loss. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):12 – 19.
Ronald Green (2005). Toward a Full Theory of Moral Status. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):44 – 46.
Don Marquis (2005). How Not to Argue That Embryos Lack Full Moral Status. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):54-56.
Thomas A. Shannon (2005). The Moral Status of the Early Human Embryo: Is a Via Media Possible? American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):43 – 44.
Robert Shabanowitz (2005). The Disposer's Dilemma. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):60-61.
Similar books and articles
A. -K. M. Andersson (2011). Embryonic Stem Cells and Property Rights. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (3):221-242.
Elizabeth Harman (2003). The Potentiality Problem. Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):173 - 198.
Christian Munthe (2001). Divisibility and the Moral Status of Embryos. Bioethics 15 (5-6):382-397.
Robert P. George (2004). Human Cloning and Embryo Research: The 2003 John J. Conley Lecture on Medical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):3-20.
P. Tully (2011). Researchers and Firing Squads: Questions Concerning the Use of Frozen Human Embryos. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (5):516-528.
Mark Moller (2009). Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research and the Discarded Embryo Argument. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (2):131-145.
Mark Brown (2013). No Ethical Bypass of Moral Status in Stem Cell Research. Bioethics 27 (1):12-19.
Carson Strong (2006). Preembryo Personhood: An Assessment of the President's Council Arguments. [REVIEW] Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (5):433-453.
Gregor Damschen & Dieter Schönecker (2006). Saving Seven Embryos or Saving One Child? Michael Sandel on the Moral Status of Human Embryos. Journal of Philosophical Research (Ethics and the Life Sciences):239-245.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads48 ( #76,037 of 1,780,225 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,765 of 1,780,225 )
How can I increase my downloads?