David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 1 (3):263-278 (1979)
Environmental ethics tends to be dominated by the idea that the right environmental actions require a change in the value systems of many people. I argue that the “rebirth” approach is perverse in that moral attitudes are not easily changed by moral suasion. A properly ethical approach must begin where we are, as moderately moral people desiring the best for all. The real ethical problem is to develop procedures for collectively defining environmental ends that will be fair to the parties participating in the decision process. This idea is essentially utilitarian, and depends on the maximization of expected social utility. This type of environmental ethics is contrasted with current theories of social choice in welfare economics and with Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andrew Brennan, Environmental Ethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Joann Myer Valenti (1998). Ethical Decision Making in Environmental Communication. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 13 (4):219 – 231.
P. Aarne Vesilind (1996). There is No Such Thing as Environmental Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (3):307-318.
Ben A. Minteer & Robert E. Manning (1999). Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics: Democracy, Pluralism, and the Management of Nature. Environmental Ethics 21 (2):191-207.
Robert E. Manning (1999). Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 21 (2):191-207.
Carmen Tanner (2009). To Act or Not to Act: Nonconsequentialism in Environmental Decision-Making. Ethics and Behavior 19 (6):479 – 495.
Mark Colyvan & Katie Steele, Environmental Ethics and Decision Theory: Fellow Travellers or Bitter Enemies?
Nicole Klenk (2009). The Ethics of “Following Nature” in Forestry. Environmental Ethics 31 (1):67-84.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #326,853 of 1,934,933 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,780 of 1,934,933 )
How can I increase my downloads?