Holists and Fascists and Paper Tigers...Oh My!

Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):103 - 117 (1996)
Abstract
Over and over, philosophers have claimed that environmental holism in general, and Leopold's Land Ethic in particular, ought to be rejected on the basis that it has fascistic implications. I argue that the land Ethic is not tantamount to environmental fascism because Leopold's moral theory accounts for the moral standing of the individual as well as "the land," a holistic ethic better protects and defends the individual in the long-run, and the term "fascism" is misapplied in this case.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,731
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Jennifer Welchman (1995). Kant and the Land Ethic. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 2 (2):17-22.
Charles J. List (1997). Is Hunting a Right Thing? Environmental Ethics 19 (4):405-416.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-05-29

Total downloads

14 ( #112,475 of 1,098,619 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #173,848 of 1,098,619 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.