David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studia Phaenomenologica 10:19-44 (2010)
Responding to critiques of Dilthey’s interpretive psychology, I revisit its relation with epistemology and the human sciences. Rather than reducing knowledge to psychology and psychology to subjective understanding, Dilthey articulated the epistemic worth of a psychology involving (1) an impure phenomenology of embodied, historically-situated, and worldly consciousness as individually lived yet complicit with its naturally and socially constituted contexts, (2) experience- and communication-oriented processes of interpreting others, (3) the use of third-person structural-functional analysis and causal explanation, and (4) a recognition of the ungroundability, facticity, and conflict inherent in knowledge and life
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Eric Sean Nelson (2008). Interpreting Practice: Dilthey, Epistemology, and the Hermeneutics of Historical Life. Idealistic Studies 38 (1/2):105-122.
A. R. (2003). The Cognition-Knowledge Distinction in Kant and Dilthey and the Implications for Psychology and Self-Understanding. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):149-164.
Uljana Feest (2007). 'Hypotheses, Everywhere Only Hypotheses!': On Some Contexts of Dilthey's Critique of Explanatory Psychology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (1):43-62.
Holly L. Wilson (1987). On Mandelbaum's Critique of Dilthey's ‘Relativism’. In Rudolf Makkreel John Scanlon (ed.), Dilthey and Phenomenology.
Guillaume Fréchette (2012). Phenomenology as Descriptive Psychology: The Munich Interpretation. Symposium 16 (2):150-170.
John Scanlon (1989). Dilthey on Psychology and Epistemology. History of Philosophy Quarterly 6 (4):347 - 355.
Eric S. Nelson (2011). Self-Reflection, Interpretation, and Historical Life in Dilthey. In Hans-Ulrich Lessing, Rudolf A. Makkreel & Riccardo Pozzo (eds.), Recent Contributions to Dilthey’s Philosophy of the Human Sciences.
Michael J. Kral (2007). Psychology and Anthropology: Intersubjectivity and Epistemology in an Interpretive Cultural Science. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 27 (2-1):257-275.
Talia Welsh (2013). The Child as Natural Phenomenologist: Primal and Primary Experience in Merleau-Ponty's Psychology. Northwestern University Press.
Dimitri Ginev (2012). Diltheyan Varieties of Double Hermeneutics in the Human Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (1):0048393112449657.
Charles F. Wallraff (1958). Sense-Datum Theory and Observational Fact: Some Contributions of Psychology to Epistemology. Journal of Philosophy 55 (January):20-31.
Eric S. Nelson (2011). The World Picture and its Conflict in Dilthey and Heidegger. Humana.Mente 18:19–38.
Added to index2011-01-06
Total downloads64 ( #70,343 of 1,934,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)50 ( #11,219 of 1,934,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?