Must we argue?

The Philosopher's Magazine (26):41-42 (2004)
Abstract Analytic philosophers often claim that the giving and criticizing of deductive arguments is the main or only business of philosophy. I argue that this is mistaken and show analytic philosophers also use formal schemas, distinctions, examples, and analogies so as to make some aspect of it manifest. That is, some analytic philosophers sometimes simply try to ‘tell it like it is’. This ‘method of descriptive manifestation’ is less commonly recognized than it should be given its divergence from the self-image of analytic philosophy
Keywords analytic philosophy  argumentation  metaphilosophy  descriptive manifestation
Categories No categories specified (fix it)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,679
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Roger Pouivet (2011). On the Polish Roots of the Analytic Philosophy of Religion. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):1 - 20.
    Ann Garry, Analytic Feminism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Daniel Andler (2000). The Undefinability of Analytic Philosophy. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:267-285.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-12-02

    Total downloads

    3 ( #201,930 of 549,087 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums