David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Research 20:349-366 (1995)
The limited objectives of this paper are to show that A), what seem to be merely superficial incoherencies in Rorty’s preferred pragmatism [according to which, “the only constraints on inquiry are conversational ones”] really are not but B), along with every assertion of Rorty’s defining his system and its consequences, belie an intrinsic incoherency resulting from that system’s intended conflation of “correspondence truth” and “pragmatic truth.” Then C), I shall argue that should we ask of a philosophy that denies to its own statements of purported fact correspondence truth what use it is, the answer has to be, “Worse than no use at all”---at least, if like Rorty’s preferred pragmatism it demonstrably concludes in the conceptual annihilation of all inquiry
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Steven Levine (2010). Rehabilitating Objectivity: Rorty, Brandom, and the New Pragmatism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):567-589.
John C. Malone (2004). Pragmatism and Radical Behaviorism: A Response to Leigland. Behavior and Philosophy 32 (2):313 - 315.
Chase Wrenn (2005). Pragmatism, Truth, and Inquiry. Contemporary Pragmatism 2 (1):95-113.
John T. Sanders (1996). Comments on Philosophy and the Dilemmas of the Contemporary World. In Józef Niznik & John T. Sanders (eds.), Debating the State of Philosophy: Habermas, Rorty, and Kolakowski. Praeger.
Susan Haack (1995). Vulgar Pragmatism. In Herman J. Saatkamp (ed.), Rorty & Pragmatism: The Philosopher Responds to His Critics. Vanderbilt University Press. 136.
Charles Hartshorne (1995). Rorty's Pragmatism and Farewell to the Age of Faith and Enlightenment. In Herman J. Saatkamp (ed.), Rorty & Pragmatism: The Philosopher Responds to His Critics. Vanderbilt University Press.
David Rondel (2009). &Quot;liberalism, Ethnocentrism, and Solidarity: Reflections on Rorty&Quot;. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:55-68.
Paul D. Forster (2000). Problems with Rorty's Pragmatist Defense of Liberalism. Journal of Philosophical Research 25:345-362.
Andrew Lambert (2012). Rorty, Pragmatism, and Confucianism. [REVIEW] Philosophy East and West 62 (1):134-139.
Robert Brandom (2011). Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Harvard University Press.
Kai Nielsen (1986). Scientism, Pragmatism, and the Fate of Philosophy. Inquiry 29 (1-4):277 – 304.
Matthew C. Halteman (2000). Agent Provocateur: A Review of Richard Rorty's Truth and Progress. [REVIEW] Books and Culture 5 (3).
Aaron Cooley (2007). Review: Of Westbrook, Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth. [REVIEW] Education and Culture 23 (2):pp. 76-79.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads2 ( #314,240 of 1,096,245 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #126,669 of 1,096,245 )
How can I increase my downloads?