Qualities and simple ideas : Hume and his debt to Berkeley
In Lawrence Nolan (ed.), Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate. Oxford University Press (2011)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Harold I. Brown (2000). Berkeley on the Conceivability of Qualities and Material Objects. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:161-168.
George Berkeley (1940/2003). A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Dover Publications.
Samuel C. Rickless (2012). The Relation Between Anti-Abstractionism and Idealism in Berkeley's Metaphysics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (4):723 - 740.
John Corvino (2008). Hume and the Second-Quality Analogy. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (2):157-173.
Lionel Shapiro (2010). Two Kinds of Intentionality in Locke. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (4):554-586.
Brian Chance (2011). Sensibilism, Psychologism, and Kant's Debt to Hume. Kantian Review 16 (3):325-349.
William H. Williams (1992). Is Hume's Shade of Blue a Red Herring? Synthese 92 (1):83 - 99.
Ruth Weintraub (2005). A Humean Conundrum. Hume Studies 31 (2):211-224.
Stephen Puryear (2005). Was Leibniz Confused About Confusion? The Leibniz Review 15:95-124.
David Landy (2007). A (Sellarsian) Kantian Critique of Hume's Theory of Concepts. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (4):445–457.
George C. Caffentzis (2010). Locke, Berkeley, and Hume as Philosophers of Money. In Silvia Parigi (ed.), George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Springer.
Douglas Lewis (1970). Some Problems of Perceptions. Philosophy of Science 37 (March):100-113.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-08-24
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?