David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 28 (1):1–24 (1998)
Even though sign-systems are a crucial part of society, critical realism, as developed by Roy Bhaskar, does not yet have an adequate theory of signs and semiosis. The few suggestions that Bhaskar offers can be advanced through the semiotics of C.S. Peirce. In doing so, however, it becomes necessary to reconsider Bhaskar's ontological domains of the real, the actual, and the subjective, and expand the last domain into one of semiosis. This new understanding of ontological domains, incorporating Peirceian semiotics, provides the basis for rethinking the ontology of society: the customary dyad structures/agents becomes the triad structures/agents/discourses, each of which possesses material, sociological, and meaningful aspects.
|Keywords||Semiosis Social ontology Peirce|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kieran Cashell (2009). Reality, Representation and the Aesthetic Fallacy: Critical Realism and the Philosophy of C. S. Peirce. Journal of Critical Realism 8 (2):135-171.
Dave Elder‐Vass (2014). Debate: Seven Ways to Be A Realist About Language. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 44 (3):249-267.
Kieran Cashell (2012). Imitation of Life: Structure, Agency and Discourse in Theatrical Performance. Journal of Critical Realism 11 (3):324-360.
Isaac Reed (2008). Justifying Sociological Knowledge: From Realism to Interpretation. Sociological Theory 26 (2):101-129.
Similar books and articles
Kathryn Dean (ed.) (2006). Realism, Philosophy and Social Science. Palgrave Macmillan.
Prof A. V. Kravchenko (2003). The Ontology of Signs as Linguistic and Non-Linguistic Entities: A Cognitive Perspective. In Kravchenko, Prof. A.V. (2003) the Ontology of Signs as Linguistic and Non-Linguistic Entities: A Cognitive Perspective. [Book Chapter]
Claus Emmeche (1999). The Biosemiotics of Emergent Properties in a Pluralist Ontology. In Edwina Taborsky (ed.), Semiosis. Evolution. Energy: Towards a Reconceptualization of the Sign. Shaker Verlag
Dave Elder-Vass (2007). A Method for Social Ontology: Iterating Ontology and Social Research. Journal of Critical Realism 6 (2):226-249.
J. Cruickshank (2010). Knowing Social Reality: A Critique of Bhaskar and Archer's Attempt to Derive a Social Ontology From Lay Knowledge. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (4):579-602.
Inna Semetsky (2006). The Language of Signs: Semiosis and the Memories of the Future. [REVIEW] Sophia 45 (1):95-116.
Tobin Nellhaus (2010). Theatre, Communication, Critical Realism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Paul Bains (2006). The Primacy of Semiosis: An Ontology of Relations. University of Toronto Press.
James Liszka (2007). Teleology and Semiosis: Commentary on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):636-644.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #108,536 of 1,778,413 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,352 of 1,778,413 )
How can I increase my downloads?