The Epistemic Value of the Democratic Process

Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 5 (1):19-32 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An epistemic theory of democracy, I assume, is meant to provide on answer to the question of why democracy is desirable. It does so by trying to show how the democratic process can have epistemic value. I begin by describing a couple of examples of epistemic theories in the literature and bringing out what they presuppose. I then examine a particular type of theory, worked out most thoroughly by Joshua Cohen, which seems to imply that democracy has epistemic value. The key idea in this theory is that its conception of political right isitselfa democratic conception – roughly, what is right is constituted by a consensus among ideal democratic agents. If democratic procedures are modeled on this conception of right, the theory proposes, the fact that we follow these procedures in decision-making will give us reason to believe that the outcomes are themselves right. I do not reject the democratic conception of the right, but I argue that the theory breaks down when we try to extend its conclusions to real-world democratic procedures. While it invites interesting speculation about possible reforms, it gives us little reason to accept the outcomes of actual democratic politics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Communities of inquiry and democratic politics.Cillian McBride - 2009 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 71-74.
Disagreement and epistemic arguments for democracy.Sean Ingham - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (2):136-155.
Epistemic Trust and Liberal Justification.Michael Fuerstein - 2012 - Journal of Political Philosophy 21 (2):179-199.
Democratic legitimacy and proceduralist social epistemology.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Democracy and ignorance: Reply to Friedman.Robert B. Talisse - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (4):453-466.
Democratic Process.David T. Risser - 1999 - In Christopher B. Gray (ed.), The Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia (vol. 1). Garland Publishing, Inc.:193-195.
How Democratic is Civil Disobedience?Daniel Weinstock - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (4):707-720.
Causal reference and epistemic justification.Jane Duran - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):272-279.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
11 (#975,863)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Disagreement and epistemic arguments for democracy.Sean Ingham - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (2):136-155.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Comment.Samuel Freeman - 2000 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (4):371-418.
Reflections on Habermas on Democracy.Joshua Cohen - 1999 - Ratio Juris 12 (4):385-416.
The Democracy/Contractualism Analogy.David Estlund - 2003 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (4):387-412.

View all 7 references / Add more references