The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Moral Argument

Religious Studies 32 (1):15-26 (1996)
The Clarke/Rowe version of the Cosmological Argument is sound only if the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) is true, but many philosophers, including Rowe, think that there is not adequate evidence for the principle of sufficient reason. I argue that there may be indirect evidence for PSR on the grounds that if we do not accept it, we lose our best justification for an important principle of metaethics, namely, the Principle of Universalizability. To show this, I argue that all the other justifications of the Principle of Universalizability on offer, including Richard Hare's, are inadequate
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    E. A. Gellner (1954). Ethics and Logic. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 55:157 - 178.
    R. M. Hare (1984). Supervenience. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58:1-16.

    View all 17 references

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Michael Della Rocca (2010). PSR. Philosophers' Imprint 10 (07).
    Jacek Wojtysiak (2007). On the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):111-135.

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    99 ( #9,109 of 1,088,810 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    45 ( #1,190 of 1,088,810 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.