Y and Z Are Not Off the Hook: The Survival Lottery Made Fairer

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (4):396-401 (2010)
Abstract
In this article I show that the argument in John Harris's famous "Survival Lottery" paper cannot be right. Even if we grant Harris's assumptions—of the justifiability of such a lottery, the correctness of maximizing consequentialism, the indistinguishability between killing and letting die, the practical and political feasibility of such a scheme—the argument still will not yield the conclusion that Harris wants. On his own terms, the medically needy should be less favored (and more vulnerable to being killed), than Harris suggests
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    John Harris (1975). The Survival Lottery. Philosophy 50 (191):81 - 87.
    Citations of this work BETA
    J. A. Bulcock (2010). Introduction. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (4):383-395.
    Similar books and articles
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-08-11

    Total downloads

    34 ( #43,048 of 1,088,833 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    3 ( #30,953 of 1,088,833 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.