David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in East European Thought 51 (1):1 - 33 (1999)
In the first two decades of the century Vvedenskij developed and defended what he took to be an original argument in support of the impossibility of metaphysical knowledge. This argument, which he hailed as a proof, involved an examination of the four laws of thought alone. As it made no appeal to the highly technical analyses found in Kant''s first Critique, Vvedenskij considered it to be more efficient and thereby effective than Kant''s own arguments. Although Vvedenskij''s estimation of his accomplishment actually increased with the passage of time, the proof rested on highly dubious assumptions.
|Keywords||Vvedenskij neo-Kantianism logicism epistemology laws of thought objectificaton|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Nemeth (1998). The Rise of Russian Neo-Kantianism: Vvedenskij's Early 'Critical Philosophy'. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 50 (2):119-151.
Thomas Nemeth (1995). Aleksandr I. Vvedenskij on Other Minds. Studies in East European Thought 47 (3-4):155 - 177.
Philip A. Ebert & Marcus Rossberg (2009). Ed Zalta's Version of Neo-Logicism: A Friendly Letter of Complaint. In Hannes Leitgeb & Alexander Hieke (eds.), Reduction – Abstraction – Analysis. Ontos. 11--305.
Marcus Rossberg & Philip A. Ebert (2007). What is the Purpose of Neo-Logicism? Traveaux de Logique 18:33-61.
Helmut Holzhey (2009). Neo-Kantianism and Phenomenology : The Problem of Intuition. In Rudolf A. Makkreel & Sebastian Luft (eds.), Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy. Indiana University Press.
Ian Proops (2006). Russell’s Reasons for Logicism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):267-292.
Andrew Chignell (2010). Kant Between the Wars: A Reply to Hohendahl. Philosophical Forum 41 (1):41-49.
Manfred Kühn (2009). Interpreting Kant Correctly: On the Kant of the Neo-Kantians. In Rudolf A. Makkreel & Sebastian Luft (eds.), Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy. Indiana University Press.
Tom Casier (1999). From Neo-Kantianism to Logicism: Vvedenskij's Mature Years. Studies in East European Thought 51 (1):1-33.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #361,786 of 1,099,911 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #304,017 of 1,099,911 )
How can I increase my downloads?