Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Indian Philosophy 40 (2):225-257 (2012)
|Abstract||In this essay, it is argued that Abhinavagupta’s theory of error, the apūrṇakhyāti theory, synthesizes two distinguishable Pratyabhijñā treatments of error that were developed in three phases prior to him. The first theory was developed in two stages, initially by Somānanda in the Śivadṛṣṭi (ŚD) and subsequently by Utpaladeva in his Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikās (ĪPK) and his short autocommentary thereon, the Īśvarapratyabhijñāvṛtti (ĪPVṛ). This theory served to explain individual acts of misperception, and it was developed with the philosophy of the Buddhist epistemologists in mind. In a third phase, Utpaladeva developed in his Śivadṛṣṭivṛtti (ŚDVṛ) a second theory of error, one that involved the noncognition of non-duality ( abhedākhyāti ) and served to explain both the appearance and perception of multiplicity, despite the strict monism to which all Pratyabhijñā authors subscribe. Abhinavagupta’s treatment of error, then, is significant not only because it was meant to explain all the various theories of error offered by opposing philosophical schools, as Rastogi has shown, but more importantly because it synthesized the thinking of his predecessors on the matter in a single, elegant account of error|
|Keywords||Pratyabhijñā apūrṇakhyāti abhedākhyāti abheda Error Buddhist epistemologists|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Chris Daly & David Liggins (2010). In Defence of Error Theory. Philosophical Studies 149 (2):209-230.
Terence Rajivan Edward (2011). Are There Uncontroversial Error Theories? Philosophical Pathways (162).
Richard Joyce (2011). The Error In 'The Error In The Error Theory'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):519-534.
David Lawrence (1996). Tantric Argument: The Transfiguration of Philosophical Discourse in the Pratyabhijñā System of Utpaladeva and Abhinavagupta. Philosophy East and West 46 (2):165-204.
Bart Streumer (2011). Can We Believe the Error Theory? Philosophical Studies 154 (4):325 - 348.
Isabelle Ratié (2007). Otherness in the Pratyabhijñā Philosophy. Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (4):313-370.
Richard Rowland (2013). Moral Error Theory and the Argument From Epistemic Reasons. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 7 (1):1-24.
John Mizzoni (2010). Evolution and Error Theory. Social Science Information 49 (2):165-194.
Hallvard Lillehammer (2011). Constructivism and the Error Theory. In Christian Miller (ed.), The Continuum Companion to Ethics. Continuum.
Brendan P. Minogue (1982). Error, Malpractice, and the Problem of Universals. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (3):239-250.
Michael Stingl & John Collier (2004). After the Fall: Religious Capacities and the Error Theory of Morality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):751-752.
Nadeem Hussain (2010). Error Theory and Fictionalism. In John Skorupski (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Ethics. Routledge.
Andy Egan (2007). Quasi-Realism and Fundamental Moral Error. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):205 – 219.
David Faraci (2013). Brown on Mackie: Echoes of the Lottery Paradox. [REVIEW] Philosophia 41 (3):751-755.
Toby Svoboda (2011). Hybridizing Moral Expressivism and Moral Error Theory. Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (1):37-48.
Added to index2012-03-24
Total downloads5 ( #170,394 of 740,333 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,333 )
How can I increase my downloads?