David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Poiesis and Praxis 3 (3):181-198 (2004)
This article discusses the future of quality control in an academic publication system that will be largely based on electronic publishing. Information and communication technologies both challenge traditional ways and open remedies for existent problems of present gate-keeping. New forms of ex-ante and of ex-post quality control may partly replace and partly amend peer review, citation indices and quality filters based on the reputation of the publisher. Open peer review, online commenting, rating, access counts and use tracking are evaluated and put in perspective. Refuting the common argument that e-publishing leads to less quality, this paper puts forward scenarios of the future quality control system. Most likely, we shall see mixed systems, combining old and new elements, of different shapes in the different research fields
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bruce Edmonds (2011). Disaggregating Quality Judgements. Mind and Society 10 (2):169-180.
Stephen Gorard (2002). Political Control: A Way Forward for Educational Research? British Journal of Educational Studies 50 (3):378 - 389.
Cynthia Hughes (2010). A Preliminary Investigation Comparing Academic Locus of Control and Perceived Quality of Academic Life Across College Students with and Without Disabilities. Inquiry 25 (1):9-16.
Brigitte Stemmer, Marianne Corre & Yves Joanette, The Mind and Brain Scholar as a Hitch-Hiker in Post-Gutenberg Galaxy: Publishing at 2000 and Beyond.
Max Albert (2011). Methodology and Scientific Competition. Episteme 8 (2):165-183.
J. Scott Armstrong (1997). Peer Review for Journals: Evidence on Quality Control, Fairness, and Innovation. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):63-84.
Susan Haack (2007). Peer Review and Publication: Lessons for Lawyers. Stetson Law Review 36 (3).
Dorota Śwituła (2006). The Concept of Quality in Clinical Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):147-156.
Sharon Gewirtz (2000). Bringing the Politics Back In: A Critical Analysis of Quality Discourses in Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 48 (4):352 - 370.
Udo Schüklenk (2011). Publishing Bioethics and Bioethics – Reflections on Academic Publishing by a Journal Editor. Bioethics 25 (2):57-61.
Daniel Luchins (2012). Two Approaches to Improving Mental Health Care: Positivist/Quantitative Versus Skill-Based/Qualitative. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 55 (3):409-434.
Wulf D. V. Lucius (2007). Publishers as Elements of the Scientific Communication System. Poiesis and Praxis 5 (2):125-137.
Paul Smeyers & Nicholas C. Burbules (2011). How to Improve Your Impact Factor: Questioning the Quantification of Academic Quality. Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (1):1-17.
Justin Solomon (2009). Programmers, Professors, and Parasites: Credit and Co-Authorship in Computer Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):467-489.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads2 ( #258,148 of 1,088,616 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #42,750 of 1,088,616 )
How can I increase my downloads?